The module is nearing an end and it is really interesting to see how all the other blogs have developed and the different approaches people have taken. Last week, my main reflection was the necessity to develop a more analytical perspective which I focused on with this week’s blog. In the infographic below, I’ve demonstrated how I did or did not achieve my aims.
In addition, with it being Topic 4 I’ve been able to analyse my development over the past topics and see how I’ve improved, becoming more confident with tools such as Powtoon.com and Canva.com. Below is a video to see the changes I made.
As I’ve mentioned before, it’s been enjoyable to see how all the topics tie together. Back in Topic 2, Alexander and I had a discussion about the importance of introducing online safety lessons as part of the school curriculum. This issue came back up on Oliver’s blog when he discussed how social media allows cyberbullying to occur and how prevalent it is. I was interested to learn from his blog that schools are slowly introducing lessons regarding online safety and cyberbullying prevention and posed the question whether parents should be taught too.
This week allowed other bloggers to really take their own approach to the topic with the option to choose their own ethical issue. Because of this, I enjoyed reading the different perspectives. Whilst I personally focused on business social media use, I especially enjoyed Rachel’s discussion on how children can’t be ethical online if they don’t understand ethics and was shocked to learn that 75% of 10-12 year olds have social media accounts. This makes for a very grey area when it comes dealing with children online. Below is a slideshow demonstrating what I learnt from reading other blogs.
Business use of social media has been on the rise ever since marketers and recruiters realised just how useful it could be for them (Copp, 2016). There are a number of reasons why businesses choose to utilise social media, as demonstrated below.
However, there are increasing problems arising from business use of social media. These include, the struggle to maintain integrity, controlling employee and customer posts about your company and the one I will focus on this week: ethical problems surrounding recruitment practices. In Topic 3, I began to investigate the rate at which social media is becoming a part of recruitment practices, as shown in the recap below.
I argue that sometimes recruiters can be unethical when utilising social media. Put simply, ethics are a set of moral principles; to be unethical is to typically do what is seen as the wrong thing to do (Bbc.co.uk, 2014). However, many have already discussed the difficulty in establishing social media ethics (Podger, 2009).
The most significant ethical issue with social recruiting is the privacy imposition it involves. In previous blog comments I have discussed how the increase in recruiters and employers looking at social media profiles imposes on one’s freedom of speech. This is something that Glenn Greenwald discusses in his TED Talk. (TED, 2014). He argues that by knowing our privacy is being invaded, people automatically become more compliant and conformist. In previous topics we have discussed whether multiple identities are better than one. When baring in mind the increasing number of recruiters and employers looking at social media profiles, it is important more than ever that employees ensure their personal profiles are on high security settings. The issue that stems from this, is that if an employee or candidate posts something that their company disagrees with, this could lead to serious consequences. For example, Justine Sacco was fired from the IAC after she published a racist tweet (Ronson, 2015). The video below outlines the ethical issues that arise from employers looking at social media profiles in more depth.
An increase in social media use has also led to an increase in online identity theft cases like the Leah Palmer/Ruth Palmer case. If an employee has unknowingly had their pictures used elsewhere online alongside undesirable content, is it possible that an employer could confuse the two and punish the employee for risking the company’s online integrity?